Please visit my web page "Urban Tenets" at https://urbantenets.nl/
************************************************
Inclusiveness is not a function of smartness of the city. A city that is labelled intelligent still can't guarantee inclusion across spectrum of inhabitants or equity of service level across range of end users with varying needs.
Talking of smart citizen app for instance, we must deliberate who are the end
users and whether digital benefits get distributed across citizens equitably or
is it even accessible to all. Thinking of those homeless, those who can't read,
those who don't own phone not to speak of smart phone, those who speak a
different language, those whose needs are not listed in app, those who are too
young or too old to use it, those who cannot access app due to health
conditions, those who are not aware that such app exist, those who are running
outdated app, those who do not have best data speed plan or access to internet
itself and many others - a citizen app may mean different things to different
inhabitants of city and meaningless to some.
Likewise in case of smart public infrastructure, how many actually access and
uses public wifi other than tourists and few motivated others; who all actually
have time and mindspace to switch to public wifi to save a miniscule amount of
money and why will they risk malware attack and phishing if they have to use it
only once in a while and when their personal telecom provider already gives
them enough data and bandwidth. Again benefits reaches to only limited segment,
actually those who are already empowered.
Like health equipment market which is skewed in a sense that those who are
already fit tends to buy or use it more to be more fit, similarly E-governance
for instance is more empowering to those who are already privileged in some
sense or other, while the life of most of marginalized or at fringe or having
specific or special needs may still remain unchanged by the noble initiatives
like E-governance and public wifi network.
A sense of inclusion, belongingness and well being in a city has a different
meaning altogether than solving city functionality through digital intervention
or otherwise.
So how do we make a city which accommodates everyone's need - digital way or
old analog way or with a parallel system of high tech and low tech intervention
or on demand digital services or near-omnipresent services delivery or tailored
door step governance and service delivery especially for those forgotten, those
having limited means, those in dier needs, those marginalized and those at the
fringe to make an equitable society.
Author: Anoop Jha
#smartinfrastructure #municipality #digital #future #policy #governance #cityplanning #urbanplanning #townplanning #inclusion #socialscience